Sustainability Science
Pattern Language
Ressources
Definitions
Centres SuS
Revues/Journal SuS
Pattern Language for Sustainability Science Intiatives
ODDs
Santé et Bien-Etre
Eau propre et assainissement
VIlles
Climat
Consommation et production responsables
Biodiversité
Partenariat mondial
Partageothèque
Publications
Bonnes Pratiques/Good Practices
Formations/Training
Projets
Ateliers/Workshops
Atelier Fondateur de Montpellier Juillet 2019
Atelier Production et consommation durables - Globalisation - Biodiversité – Eau
Atelier Santé-Climat-Environnement
Atelier Villes & Changement global
Synthèse du Cycle
Rechercher
×
Se connecter
×
Se connecter
Email ou NomWiki
Mot de passe
Mot de passe perdu ?
Se souvenir de moi
S'inscrire
Aide
Gestion du site
Tableau de bord
Base de données
Sustainability Science
Sustainability Science Pattern
Pour une démarche vers les Sciences de la Durabilité
Saisir une fiche : Pattern Languages for Sustainability Science Initiatives
PATTERN NAME (written in capital)
Pattern completeness
Sketchy
Incomplete *
Complete * *
PATTERN Category
SCIENTIFIC APPROACH
STRATEGY
WORKSHOP STRUCTURE/DESIGN
FACILITATION RECIPES
FACILITATION INGREDIENTS
SUPPORTIVE DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES
ENABLING OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS
COMPOSTABILITY
Image (optionnal)
summary
Focus on trust-building between key players.
Activer JavaScript pour joindre des fichiers.
Fichier
Annuler
Échoué
Argumentation
A project is like a tree without strong and deep roots, it will fall down after the first storm. Trust and mutual understanding between participants are the most essential roots of a collective project. Trust is an essential part of effective collaboration. Without it, most groups fall apart. However, we are often naive in how we design for trust. Therefore, invest a lot of time to build to build mutual understanding and trust between participants. No matter how sophisticated your design, high trust. High-trust groups are about forgiveness. Low-trust groups are about permission. In low-trust groups, people fear that they won’t be properly represented and that others won’t make good decisions on their own, so they insist on being part of every decision. Decision-making is often time-consuming and ineffective as a result. These groups often try to compensate by adding more rigid, formal governance structures. There are two ways to navigate around this. The first is to remember that there are other ways to invest in trust beyond building new structures — specifically, investing in relationships. The second is to think more intentionally and creatively about the structures you build. Invest in relationships first, then design structures that reinforce, rather than replace, trust. When you design for trust, the results are often simpler and more elegant (and sometimes counter-intuitive). These designs give up control rather than assert it, resulting in greater agility and higher quality.
Activer JavaScript pour joindre des fichiers.
Fichier
Annuler
Échoué
References
- Kim, E.E. (2014) Investing in and Designing for Trust http://fasterthan20.com/2014/08/investing-in-and-designing-for-trust/ - Marseault, L. Personal communication
Activer JavaScript pour joindre des fichiers.
Fichier
Annuler
Échoué
Linked patterns (Larger or smaller patterns)
- VARIOUS FACILITATION METHODS - NARRATIVE TECHNICS - MEAL SHARING - ICEBREAKERS
Activer JavaScript pour joindre des fichiers.
Fichier
Annuler
Échoué
Valider
Annuler
×
Télécharger le fichier
Texte du lien de téléchargement
Afficher le pdf dans la page :
sous forme de lien
directement inclus dans la page
Alignement de l'image
Texte en dessous
Gauche
Centre
Droite
Taille de l'image
Miniature (140x97)
Moyenne (300x209)
Large (780x544)
Taille originale
Texte de la vignette
Paramètres avancés
Lien associé
Effets graphiques
Bord blanc
Ombre portée
Agrandissement au survol
Ajouter un lien pour afficher l'image seule en entier
Oui
Non
Texte de remplacement